Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Fulkerth

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1892No. 14603PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying him a new trial. He had also taken an appeal from the judgment, and on that appeal the judgment was by this court affirmed. (90 Cal. 157.) There had also been an earlier judgment in the trial court in favor of plaintiff; and on appeal by defendant from that judgment, and from an order denying a new trial, it was reversed and a new trial ordered. (Barnhart V. Fulkerth, 73 Cal. 526.) Upon those two appeals the main questions in the case were decided against the contention of plaintiff. In the last appeal from the judgment, it was definitely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. FulkerthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barnhart v. FulkerthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API