Montgomery v. Sping Valley Mining & Irrigating Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and for an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage against the mortgagor, Garret Keppel, and the Spring Valley Mining and Irrigating Company. Other persons were made parties, which need not be here especially mentioned. As to all’ these defendants except Keppel, the general allegation is made that they have, or claim to have, some interest in or claim upon said lands, or some part thereof, as purchasers, mortgagees, judgment creditors, or otherwise, which interests or claims are subsequent to and subject to the lien of plaintiff's mortgage. The defendant corporation above named set up…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Lackmann v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.