Harris v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
Appeal by. DefeNdant CaeoliNA Power & Light CompaNY.
The Carolina Power & Light Company has one assignment of error: ■“the action of the court in denying portions of its motion to strike, as shown in the order appealed from.” This assignment of error is based on this exception: “Carolina Power & Light Company objects, and excepts to that portion of the foregoing order which denies parts of its motion to strike.”
This is a general broadside assignment of error. It specifies nothing: it designates no particular ruling to which exception is taken. It blithely invites us to go on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Howerton v. H. Scherer & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Hayes v. Bon Marche, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957