Legal Opinion

Harris v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Appeal by. DefeNdant CaeoliNA Power & Light CompaNY.

The Carolina Power & Light Company has one assignment of error: ■“the action of the court in denying portions of its motion to strike, as shown in the order appealed from.” This assignment of error is based on this exception: “Carolina Power & Light Company objects, and excepts to that portion of the foregoing order which denies parts of its motion to strike.”

This is a general broadside assignment of error. It specifies nothing: it designates no particular ruling to which exception is taken. It blithely invites us to go on a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Howerton v. H. Scherer & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Hayes v. Bon Marche, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API