Hayes v. Bon Marche, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The essential rules governing appeals from lower court rulings on motions to strike are collected and assembled in Daniel v. Gardner, 240 N.C. 249, 81 S.E. 2d 660. Under application of principles there stated, we conclude that paragraph 7 of the complaint contains some factual allegations which withstand the defendant’s motion to strike. Watkins v. Furnishing Co., 224 N.C. 674, 31 S.E. 2d 917; 65 C.J.S. Negligence, Sec. 234.
Conceding as we may that the challenged paragraph contains irrelevant and redundant matter, nevertheless it is noted that the refusal of the court to strike all three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Nance v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965