Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guilmette v. Howes

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 21, 2010No. 08-2256Published

1DissentGriffin, Circuit Judge

“[T]he pedestal of the entire procedural-default doctrine ... is respect for state procedural rules.” Franklin v. Hightower, 215 F.3d 1196, 1200 (11th Cir.2000). As the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized,

Federal habeas corpus principles must inform and shape the historic and still vital relation of mutual respect and common purpose existing between the States and the federal courts. In keeping this delicate balance we have been careful to limit the scope of federal intrusion into state criminal adjudications and to safeguard the States’ interest in the integrity of their criminal and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API