Hoaks v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Ronald Hoaks appeals from the post-conviction court's denial of his Motion to Correct Error, and raises the following issue for our review: Whether the trial court properly denied Hoaks's motion for post-conviction relief.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March 1987, Hoaks was adjudged to be an habitual traffic violator ("HTV"), and the trial court suspended his license effective March 1987. In November 1990, Hoaks pleaded guilty to Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated, as Class A misdemeanor, and Operating While an Habitual Traffic Violator, a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Gentry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Dew v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Derrick R. Burt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.