Legal Opinion

Hoaks v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2005No. 50A05-0502-PC-104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Ronald Hoaks appeals from the post-conviction court's denial of his Motion to Correct Error, and raises the following issue for our review: Whether the trial court properly denied Hoaks's motion for post-conviction relief.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In March 1987, Hoaks was adjudged to be an habitual traffic violator ("HTV"), and the trial court suspended his license effective March 1987. In November 1990, Hoaks pleaded guilty to Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated, as Class A misdemeanor, and Operating While an Habitual Traffic Violator, a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gentry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dew v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Derrick R. Burt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API