Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. Russell Oney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2013No. 49S05-1212-CR-668PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

Although a defendant who pleads guilty to driving while suspended as a habitual traffic violator may not later challenge the plea contending that an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of procedural error, a defendant may be entitled to relief where an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of material error.

Facts and Procedural History

In January 1994, the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles sent notice to Russell Oney advising him of his status as a habitual traffic violator (“HTV”) and informing Oney that his driving license would be suspended for ten…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Scott Logan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Scott Hitch v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State of Indiana v. Matthew StidhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State of Indiana v. Nicolas LindauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API