State of Indiana v. Russell Oney
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Justice.
Although a defendant who pleads guilty to driving while suspended as a habitual traffic violator may not later challenge the plea contending that an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of procedural error, a defendant may be entitled to relief where an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of material error.
Facts and Procedural History
In January 1994, the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles sent notice to Russell Oney advising him of his status as a habitual traffic violator (“HTV”) and informing Oney that his driving license would be suspended for ten…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Scott Logan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Scott Hitch v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Indiana v. Matthew StidhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Indiana v. Nicolas LindauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.