Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. Russell Oney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2012No. 49A05-1204-CR-196PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Russell Oney’s motion to set aside his 2002 guilty plea to the charge of operating a vehicle while an habitual traffic violator, a Class D felony (“HTV conviction”). The State presents a single issue for review: whether the trial court erred when it vacated Oney’s 2002 guilty plea to the HTV conviction on the ground that one of the predicate offenses to the HTV conviction had been reversed in post-conviction proceedings with the agreement of the State.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HollinIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API