State of Indiana v. Russell Oney
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Russell Oney’s motion to set aside his 2002 guilty plea to the charge of operating a vehicle while an habitual traffic violator, a Class D felony (“HTV conviction”). The State presents a single issue for review: whether the trial court erred when it vacated Oney’s 2002 guilty plea to the HTV conviction on the ground that one of the predicate offenses to the HTV conviction had been reversed in post-conviction proceedings with the agreement of the State.
We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HollinIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013