Legal Opinion

State v. Starks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2004No. 31S04-0308-PC-352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

A defendant who pleads guilty to driving while suspended as an habitual traffic violator may not later challenge the plea on grounds that the underlying offense is invalid.

Facts and Procedural History

Kevin Starks has a long history of traffic offenses. In March 1991, July 1991, and October 1993, he was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. As a result, in November 1998, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles ("BMV") sent notice advising Starks of his status as an habitual traffic violator ("HTV") and informing him that his license would be suspended for ten years beginning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gentry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. StarksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Indiana v. Russell OneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hoaks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State of Indiana v. Chad BryantIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API