Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1883No. 9819PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Warrick Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— Appellee commenced this action in the superior court of Vanderburgh county, to recover from appellant $250, claimed as commission due appellee for procuring a purchaser for certain real estate in the city of Evansville belonging to the wife of appellant.

The action was brought upon a special contract, which was in parol, and the complaint consisted of three paragraphs: The first alleged a contract for procuring a purchaser; the second for procuring a purchaser or selling; the third for selling.

*244A demurrer was overruled to the first and second paragraphs, and sustained to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Love v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Lane v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Tracy v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API