Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hennes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1922No. 11,221PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, P. J.

— This is an action by appellant against appellee based on a written contract relating to the sale of real estate. The complaint is in a single paragraph, and was answered by a general denial. On the trial the court made a special finding of facts, and stated as its conclusions of law thereon, that appellant should take nothing by his action, and that appellee recover his costs. Appellant filed motions for a venire de novo and for a new trial, each of which was overruled. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellee on the conclusions of law, and. this appeal followed. The assignment of errors…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cole v. ArmourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Whitcomb v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Teitge v. Remy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. George N. Goldman, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Steve C. Fadell, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Sutton v. Roth, Wehrly, Heiny, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. McKENNA v. TurpinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Milgram v. MilgramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API