Dieter v. Bowers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1. —Notes—Indorsement—Findings of Fact—Presumption. Error from .the District Court of El Paso. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Goggin.
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, Chief Justice.
The case comes here on conclusions of fact filed by the trial judge, there being no statement of facts. The facts found, substantially stated, are as follows:
J. P. Dieter gave Mark Miller his four notes for $5,000 each, dated March 15, 1901, payable ten years after date to the order of said Miller at the State Rational Bank of El Paso, Texas, with interest from maturity at six percent per annum, each of said notes providing that, if not paid at maturity and collected by suit, an additional sum of ten percent on the amount thereof, as attorney’s fees, should be paid.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Hawes v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Fowler v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- National Life Insurance v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Hewett v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whalen v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Amuny v. Seaboard Bank & Trust Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Natalia v. WitthausTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Chandler v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Seaboard Bank & Trust Co. v. AmunyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.