Amuny v. Seaboard Bank & Trust Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.
The sole issue presented in this case is the right of the defendant in error as holder of plaintiff in error’s promissory note, to recover the stipulated attorneys’ fees under the circumstances shown. The trial court denied the plaintiff a recovery for such fees, but this judgment was reformed by the Court of Civil Appeals so as to allow them. 6 S.W.(2d) 186.
The defense against such recovery was this:
That the note was an installment note payable in monthly sums containing the usual stipulation for 10 per cent, attorneys’ fees “if this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First National Bank of Eagle Lake v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Lanier v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Rushing v. Citizens' National Bank of PlainviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Astin v. MostellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Triton Oil & Gas Corporation v. EW Moran Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Natalia v. WitthausTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Chandler v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.