Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Etheridge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1968No. 14660PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

Suit by appellant, Michael C. Whalen, herein called Whalen, for wrongful foreclosure under a deed of trust securing a promissory note executed by Whalen to J. B. Etheridge and wife, Pearl T. Ethe-ridge, herein called Etheridge, to set aside the trustee’s sale in said foreclosure, and for title and possession of the property covered in said deed of trust. Appellees Etheridge, by counter-claim, sought a deficiency judgment upon said promissory note and, in the alternative, for judgment for the total balance due thereon, and for judicial foreclosure of the deed of trust.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. San Antonio Real Estate Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jasper State Bank v. BraswellTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hemphill v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Bludworth, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. Shumway v. Horizon Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Savers Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Horst R. Reetz and Kathleen K. ReetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Pruske v. National Bank of Commerce of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. United States v. Dunham R. Sellers and Jackie Sakiko Deki SellersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API