Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthews

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2002No. 01-50440PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

For the second time, Jeffrey Matthews appeals his sentences for convictions of carjacking and conspiracy to commit carjacking. Although both sentences violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), these errors are harmless under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), so we affirm.

I

A

We described the facts of Matthews’s heinous crimes in his first appeal, United States v. Matthews, 178 F.3d 295, 297-98 (5th Cir.1999) (“Matthews I”), so we review them only briefly here. Matthews and three…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API