Legal Opinion

Sylva v. Kuck

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1966No. Civ. 11117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

In this suit to quiet title to an easement in plaintiffs Sylva for the use of a road crossing defendants Ruck’s lands 1 the Sylvas were successful in the trial court. On appeal the Kucks contend the evidence does not support the judgment establishing the easement. They contend further that even assuming the evidence was sufficient to show the existence of the easement that portion of the judgment which prohibits the maintenance of gates by them was beyond either the issues or supporting evidence and should be stricken from the decree. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. AlamilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Balthrop v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Yeckel v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Berry v. SbragiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API