Legal Opinion

Yeckel v. Connell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1973No. 4141PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINTYRE, Justice.

Dr. Jay Robert Connell and his wife, Irene S. Connell, together with Charles E. Lewton, D. Keith Spencer and Floyd R. King, brought an action against Phil Yeck-el and Jane Yeckel, husband and wife, to establish the right of plaintiffs to a right-of-way easement across lands of the defendants.

The district court held the plaintiffs had an easement through the land of defendants and defendants have appealed. The question we must first decide is whether plaintiffs sustained their burden of proving they had a prescriptive right to an easement over defendants’ land. We find there…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Roberts v. QuisenberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Cook v. BolinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gregory v. SandersWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Koontz v. Town of SuperiorWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shumway v. Tom Sanford, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Koontz v. Town of South SuperiorWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. v. Chapple-Hawkes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API