Zielinski v. Clorox Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that OCGA § 51-5-7, which provides that in defamation actions certain communications are deemed privileged, can be used as an evidentiary privilege to prevent admission of a party’s statements into evidence for impeachment purposes. We conclude that the Court of Appeals erred in so holding. Further, we reject the appellees’ contention that the conversation in question was protected by the attorney-client privilege. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas, Jane Roe and John Doe. Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Southern Business MacHines of Savannah, Inc. v. Norwest Financial Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- General Motors Corp. v. ConkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Kennedy v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. of Georgia v. AshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Fleming v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Zielinski v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Andrews v. D'SouzaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.