In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas, Jane Roe and John Doe. Intervenor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Intervenor-Appellant 1 appeals from the district court’s order compelling the testimony of two attorneys, John Doe and Jane Roe, before a federal grand jury. He argues that the district court erred by: (1) applying the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege to compel the attorneys’ testimony; (2) applying the exception too broadly and refusing to review the questions to be asked of the attorneys before the grand jury; (3) refusing to disclose or to allow rebuttal of the government’s in camera, ex parte showing that the crime-fraud exception…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.