McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Adler
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
We granted this application for interlocutory appeal in order to consider the trial court’s order directing McKesson HBOC, Inc. and HBO & Company (“McKesson”) to produce documents McKesson contends are privileged and protected by the work-product doctrine. Because we conclude that the trial court failed to conduct the required investigation and analysis of McKesson’s work-product claim or to rule on the merits of that claim, we vacate and remand for a determination of that issue. We affirm the trial court’s decision, however, with respect to the attorney-client…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ambler v. ArcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- G. H. Bass & Co. v. Fulton County Board of Tax AssessorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Louisiana Forum Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Pyle v. City of CedartownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Georgia International Life Insurance v. BoneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Clay v. OxendineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Boyd v. Johngalt Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Mincey v. Georgia Department of Community AffairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Wellstar Health Systems, Inc. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.