Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Conkle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1997No. A96A1785PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

As a sanction for discovery abuse the court struck General Motors’ (“GM”) answer and granted default judgment as to liability. The order was certified for immediate review, and we granted GM’s application for interlocutory appeal.

The parents of Howell W. Conkle, Jr. and the administrator of his estate brought a wrongful death suit on September 18, 1992, against the owner and the operator of a 1987 Pontiac Grand Am. They alleged that Conkle was riding in the front passenger seat on August 3, 1991, when the car left the road and, on impact with the ground, Conkle was thrown out…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ambler v. ArcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Schrembs v. Atlanta Classic Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Medical Security Group, Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Resource Life Insurance Co. v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Howard v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Yarbrough v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API