Slayden v. O'Dea
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Crouch & Crouch, Bradner W. Lee, Bradner W. Lee, Jr., and Kenyon F. Lee for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
—The plaintiff, having furnished certain supplies to a contractor, brought this action to recover on his own and certain similar assigned claims. M. P. O’Dea appeals from that portion of the judgment giving to respondent a lien upon two bonds, Nos. 9 and 10, of improvement district No. 5 of the county of Los Angeles, which bonds are now in the custody of John N. Hunt, treasurer of the county of Los Angeles, and which represent two-tenths of the contract price payable to the contractor for the improvement of certain streets within such districtt (Stats. 1907, p. 806), under a contract of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Las Posas Water Co. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.