Legal Opinion
Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture v. Pacific Erectors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1992No. Nos. 90-55308, 90-55372, 90-55374, 90-55376 and 90-55378PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
This appeal stems from a contract dispute between a general contractor, Brin-derson-Newberg Joint Venture (Brinder-son), a subcontractor, Pacific Erectors (Pacific), and the bonding company that issued Pacific’s performance bond, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford). Brinderson appeals the district court’s denial of Brinderson’s motions for a directed verdict and for JNOV. Brinderson argues that a directed verdict or JNOV was necessary because the jury verdicts on Brinder-son’s contract claim and Pacific’s fraud claim were dependent on inadmissible…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Altera Corp. v. Clear Logic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Pioneer Liquidating Corp. v. United States Trustee (In Re Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage Entities)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hoffman v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.