People v. Lanham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummeb, J.
The defendant was convicted upon counts two and three of an information containing five counts. Count two charged the defendant with the crime of attempt to commit rape. Count three charged the defendant with the violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, naming the child.
The defendant’s motion for a new trial being denied, this appeal is from the order of the court denying his motion, and, also, from the judgment pronounced following the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty as above stated.
Upon this appeal no question is made as to the sufficiency of the testimony to support the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. RambaudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. SachauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. ErwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.