Legal Opinion

Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1990No. D008521PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

225 Cal.App.3d 548 (1990)

275 Cal. Rptr. 250

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., Intervener and Respondent.

Docket No. D008521.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

November 21, 1990.

COUNSEL

Horton, Knox, Carter & Foote, J. Penn Carter, Reginald L. Knox, Jr., Jennings, Engstrand & Henrikson, Paul D. Engstrand and Richard G. Opper for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Andrea S. Ordin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, R.H.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carmel Valley Fire Protection District v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Anserv Insurance Services, Inc. v. KelsoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. California Ass'n of Retail Tobacconists v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API