Legal Opinion

Gulf Mail Steamship Co. v. W. A. Hammond Steamship Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1924No. Civ. No. 4891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court amending nunc pro tunc a previous order granting a new trial.

After the transcript, certified by the clerk and by the trial judge, had been filed in this court, respondent made herein a motion for affirmance of the judgment upon technical grounds. It appears that appeal was taken in due time (sec. 953a, Code Civ. Proc.), transcript prepared and filed, and notice given of presentation of transcript to the trial judge for approval. The trial judge approved the transcript on January 3d. Thereafter appellant discovered that through inadvertence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Brush v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Unger v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. White v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Maxwell v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Collins v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Haynes v. Los Angeles Railroad Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API