Legal Opinion

Unger v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1923No. Civ. No. 4404PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor, after a jury trial, for damages resulting from a collision between an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding and a street-ear of the appellant. The contentions of the appellant are chiefly predicated upon the evidence in the case, which will be reviewed in dealing with the various points made in the course of these contentions.

The collision occurred upon East 12th Street, in the city of Oakland, along which the street-car tracks of appellant extend, and at a point thereon a short distance east of the intersection of 12th Street…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hansen v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rapp v. Southern Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Reinhart v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Aungst v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Gulf Mail Steamship Co. v. W. A. Hammond Steamship Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API