Legal Opinion
Haney v. Laub
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 3, 1973PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BIFFERATO, Judge.
John T. Haney, plaintiff, filed a complaint against Felix L. Laub, defendant, alleging that Laub has violated the terms of a Stock Option Agreement. The complaint was brought under 10 Del.C. § 6501 for declaratory relief, seeking a judgment declaring and adjudicating the respective rights and duties of Haney and Laub under the written Stock Option Agreement executed in February, 1968.
Two issues are before the Court on this motion by Laub for summary judgment. First, could Haney be discharged from his position as manager of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Beard v. ElsterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Zimmer v. Wells Management CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Heideck v. Kent General Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Reiver v. MURDOCH & WALSH, PADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Meding v. HurdDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Avallone v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- In Re Grievance of CarlsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.