Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 17, 1952PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tunnell, Justice,

delivering the opinion of the court:

On the 14th day of March, 1951, the nine members of the board of directors of defendant corporation unanimously adopted what is referred to in Section 130A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 130A, as a “restricted stock option plan”. The plan provided, (1), for granting to seven -specified officers of the company, six of whom were members of the board of directors, an option to purchase various designated amounts of the common stock of the corporation, totalling 24,500 shares, and (2), for setting aside the further quantity of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  4. Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  5. Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Pogostin v. RiceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API