Legal Opinion

Rockway v. Stefani

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1975No. 88468, CA 4641PublishedCited by 10 opinions

petition for review pending

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This writ of review proceeding is a challenge to a conditional use permit issued to the intervenor, Hi-mount Land, Inc., by the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners to begin constructing a planned unit development known as Cedar Ridge.

Although as noted below, the detailed plans for Cedar Ridge are not now known, the apparent present intent is to build 1600 dwelling units on about 400 acres near Brightwood. Himount’s application for the conditional use permit also indicated the development would include recreational facilities such as a golf course, and 17 acres of commercial development,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Marggi v. RueckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kristensen v. City of Eugene Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Neuberger v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. In Re Approval of Request for Amendment to Frawley Planned Unit DevelopmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API