Legal Opinion
Marggi v. Ruecker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 31, 1975No. 33-367PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The question presented by this appeal is: Is an amendment of a comprehensive land use plan as it affects a single small parcel of property “judicial” as distinguished from “legislative” as those words are used in Fasano v. Washington Co. Comm., 264 Or 574, 507 P2d 23 (1973) Í As we interpret Fasano, such an amendment is judicial.
The city of Hillsboro owns a 5.29-acre tract of land which is currently used by the city as a park. Hillsboro’s comprehensive long-range land use plan designates the tract for use as a park. Hillsboro’s current zoning ordinance designates the tract as residential. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Tierney v. DurisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.