Legal Opinion
Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAH
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 2, 1975No. 394 342PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Plaintiff wants to develop his 18 acres of rural property on the Multnomah Channel of the Willamette River near Portland by constructing a marina for 70 houseboats. The defendant county commissioners denied plaintiff permission to do so. In this writ of review proceeding, the circuit court determined that plaintiff should be able to construct the marina:
“IT IS ORDERED:
“1. This matter is remanded to the Board of Commissioners of Multnomah County, and it is ordered to approve the application of the plaintiff by reclassifying said land described as Tax Lot 1, Section 36, 3 North 2 West,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Tierney v. DurisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Dickinson v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, CLACKAMAS CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Marggi v. RueckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.