Legal Opinion

Kristensen v. City of Eugene Planning Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1976No. 75-0206, CA 4710PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This writ of review proceeding is a challenge to a conditional use permit issued by the Eugene Planning Commission to respondent Briarwood Associates. The plaintiffs, who own property near Briarwood’s, appeal from a circuit court judgment upholding the commission’s action.

We have previously distinguished the procedural and substantive rules of Fasano v. Washington County Comm., 264 Or 574, 507 P2d 23 (1973). See, Auckland v. Bd. of Comm. Mult. Co., 21 Or App 596, 536 P2d 444, Sup Ct review denied (1975). And we have held the procedural requirements announced in that case to be applicable when…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Marracci v. City of ScappooseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Delta Biological Resources, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Anderson v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Braidwood v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API