Legal Opinion
Sol Back v. Bank Hapoalim, B.M., and Gil Karni
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2026No. 1:23-cv-02040Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SOL BACK, Plaintiff, ~ against - OPINION & ORDER 23-cv-2040 (ER) BANK HAPOALIM, B.M., and GIL KARNI, Defendants. RAMOS, D.J.: Sol Back claims that her former employers Bank Hapoalim, B.M. (“BHI”) and Gil Karni (collectively “Defendants’’) violated federal and state law by retaliating against her for filing a complaint against Karni. Doc. 1 at 1. While Back was employed at BHI, she took screenshots of emails from her and Karni’s inboxes and used the screenshots in this litigation. Docs. 58 § 7, 50-7. In the instant motion, Defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Walter W. GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAZELETT STRIP-CASTING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Pure Power Boot Camp v. Warrior Fitness Boot CampDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Fayemi v. Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Niceforo v. UBS Global Asset Management Americas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014