Legal Opinion
Pure Power Boot Camp v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2008No. 08 Civ. 4810(JGK)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice to renewal.
The parties were authorized to begin expedited discovery on or after October 13, 2008. The parties should provide the Court with a Scheduling Order by October 29, 2008.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Katz dated August 22, 2008. No objections have been filed and the time for objections has passed. Moreover, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is thorough and well founded and the Court therefore adopts it.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Patrick Hately v. Dr. David WattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Vista Marketing, LLC v. Terri A. BurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.