Legal Opinion

Fayemi v. Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 1997No. 95 Civ. 5731(LAP)(JCF)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANCIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case presents two significant issues concerning discovery sanctions: first, whether a federal court has the power to sanction a party for obtaining evidence improperly outside of the litigation process; and second, whether otherwise appropriate sanctions should be withheld where the party seeking them has itself engaged in misconduct.

These questions arise in the context of an employment discrimination case. The plaintiff, Wole Fayemi, alleges that he was terminated from his job as a stock analyst at the firm of Hambrecht and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Turner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Partners v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Orbit One Communications, Inc. v. Numerex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Pure Power Boot Camp v. Warrior Fitness Boot CampDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Balaber-Strauss v. Town of Harrison (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Green v. McClendonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API