Legal Opinion

Kosanke v. Kopp

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1953No. 7999PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as appellant, brought an action against defendants, hereinafter referred to as respond ents, seeking to perpetually restrain and enjoin respondents from traveling over and across lands of appellant.

Respondents contended that the two routes traveled over and across said lands, one known as the “Sunbeam Road” and the other known as the “Blind Springs Gulch Road”, both of which go through the farming lands of appellant, are and have been public highways since the earliest days of the settlers in the county; on the other hand, appellant asserts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meservey v. GullifordIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. Rio Nido Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Norrie v. FlemingIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ross v. SwearingenIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gross v. McNuttIdaho Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. NesbittIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Argosy Trust Ex Rel. Its Trustee v. WiningerIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. County of Bonner v. DyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API