Legal Opinion

Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. Wingard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 10, 2000No. 25169Published

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

This case concerns a priority dispute between a perfected security interest and a landlord’s distress lien. The Court of Appeals held the landlord’s lien took priority over the prior perfected security interest. Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. Wingard (Ex parte J.M. Smith Corp.), 330 S.C. 479, 498 S.E.2d 908 (Ct.App.1998). We reverse.

*444FACTS

The essential facts of this case are not in dispute. Thomas and Gloria Wingard operated Westside Pharmacy on premises leased from Respondent. Petitioner has a perfected security interest in all the pharmacy’s inventory, proceeds, accounts, files,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Oxford Finance Companies, Inc. v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Burnett v. BoukedesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Tolemac, Inc. v. United Trading, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API