Legal Opinion

Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. Wingard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1998No. 2825PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, Judge:

Greenwood Petroleum Company commenced this action by distraining the inventory, fixtures and equipment of its holdover tenant, Westside Pharmacy, pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 27-39-210 (1991). J.M. Smith Corporation, the holder of a perfected security interest in the seized property, claimed priority in the proceeds of the sale of the distrained property. The magistrate and circuit courts denied Smith’s claim of priority. Smith appeals. We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether a landlord’s right to distrain property for past due rent takes priority over a perfected security interést in the property.

F…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Tolemac, Inc. v. United Trading, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API