Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. Wingard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUFF, Judge:
Greenwood Petroleum Company commenced this action by distraining the inventory, fixtures and equipment of its holdover tenant, Westside Pharmacy, pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 27-39-210 (1991). J.M. Smith Corporation, the holder of a perfected security interest in the seized property, claimed priority in the proceeds of the sale of the distrained property. The magistrate and circuit courts denied Smith’s claim of priority. Smith appeals. We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether a landlord’s right to distrain property for past due rent takes priority over a perfected security interést in the property.
F…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Tolemac, Inc. v. United Trading, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000