Legal Opinion

Tolemac, Inc. v. United Trading, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 21, 1997No. 24607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

This case involves the construction of our statutory scheme allowing the distraint of personal property for rent. The master found third-party property on the rented premises was not subject to distraint. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Tolemac (Landlord) subleased a warehouse to United Trading, Inc. (Tenant). When Tenant’s rent was in arrears for $41,666, Landlord commenced this action for collection of rent by distraint pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 27-39-210 (1991). Under this statutory procedure, a landlord obtains a distress warrant from a magistrate after a predistress…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Pettigrew v. WombleDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Langdale v. CARPETSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Design Gaps, Inc. v. Distinctive Design & Construction LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  5. Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API