Tolemac, Inc. v. United Trading, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
This case involves the construction of our statutory scheme allowing the distraint of personal property for rent. The master found third-party property on the rented premises was not subject to distraint. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Tolemac (Landlord) subleased a warehouse to United Trading, Inc. (Tenant). When Tenant’s rent was in arrears for $41,666, Landlord commenced this action for collection of rent by distraint pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 27-39-210 (1991). Under this statutory procedure, a landlord obtains a distress warrant from a magistrate after a predistress…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Pettigrew v. WombleDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Langdale v. CARPETSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Design Gaps, Inc. v. Distinctive Design & Construction LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
- Greenwood Petroleum Co. v. WingardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000