Blackwell v. Quarterly County Court of Shelby County
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Chief Justice.
Presented in this case is the extent to which a local legislative body may validly modify the terms of a retirement and pension plan which it had previously adopted for the benefit of public employees. If such authority exists, two additional questions are presented: (1) the reasonableness of a 1977 modification challenged by members of the plan, and (2) determination of those members to whom it can validly be applied.
After a trial on the merits the Chancellor held that the governing body could make reasonable changes even if these were detrimental to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Miles v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peter M. Garvie v. Charles O. Jackson and George W. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Smith v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Faust v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Hall v. Shelby County Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.