State v. McDonnell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, appellants challenge their convictions of first-degree driving while impaired, arguing that a 2003 amendment to Minn.Stat. § 169A.03, subd. 21, that excluded a license suspension for underage drinking and driving from the definition of “prior impaired driving-related loss of license” and became effective on August 1, 2003, should be retroactively applied to their driving violations, which occurred before August 1, 2003, because the amendment clarified, rather than changed, existing law. Alternatively, appellants argue that if the 2003…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BasalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BasalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009