Legal Opinion

State v. Becerra

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2002No. S-01-1111PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Eusebio L. Becerra, was convicted by a jury of kidnapping as a Class LA felony. He moved for postconviction relief, claiming he received ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel in his first postconviction proceeding. He also claims that his trial counsel was ineffective under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), because his trial counsel failed to object to a jury instruction. He argues that the instruction did not allow the jury to consider whether he was guilty of kidnapping as a Class II felony, which carries a lesser…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BecerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SchnecklothNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. DavlinNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API