Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2005No. S-03-893PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In 1996, Damian J. Marshall was tried before a jury and convicted of second degree murder, attempted second degree murder, and two counts of using a firearm to commit a felony. His convictions were affirmed by this court on direct appeal. State v. Marshall, 253 Neb. 676, 573 N.W.2d 406 (1998). On January 31, 2003, Marshall filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief. The district court for Douglas County denied the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Marshall appeals from that order.

FACTS

The facts underlying Marshall’s convictions are set forth in detail in our opinion in…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. AbdullahNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. IromuanyaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DeckardNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API