Pater v. Pater
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Today we reaffirm that a domestic relations court may consider the religious practices of the parents in order to protect the best interests of a child. Birch v. Birch (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 85, 11 OBR 327, 463 N.E.2d 1254. However, the United States Constitution flatly prohibits a trial court from ever evaluating the merits of religious doctrine or defining the contents of that doctrine. Thomas v. Review Bd. of Ind. Emp. Sec. Div. (1981), 450 U.S. 707, 101 S.Ct. 1425, 67 L.Ed.2d 624. Furthermore, custody may not be denied to a parent solely because she will not encourage her child to salute…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Simmons-Harris v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Chandler v. BishopSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Harrison v. TauheedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.