Huiet v. Wallace
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The questions presented for decision in this case are, (1) whether the evidence supported the findings of fact of the board of review, and (2) whether the decision of the board of review based on the facts as found was proper under the law.
The material facts found by the board and necessary to their decision were: that claimant lives in Winder; she had worked in a garment factory in Braselton, Georgia, as a trimmer when she became unemployed; Braselton is 8 or 9 miles from Winder; she was offered employment at Statham, Georgia, in a garment factory which is a distance of 8 miles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Morgan v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employ. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Copeland v. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberson v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Tunget v. State of Washington Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Banks v. HuietCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Banks v. HuietCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Roberson v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985