Roberson v. Tanner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Dissent
McMurray Presiding Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the decision reached by the majority. In determining whether a claimant is disqualified under OCGA § 34-8-158, consideration must be given to the legislative directive that unemployment funds are to be used for persons who become unemployed through no fault of their own. Ford Motor Co. v. Abercrombie, 207 Ga. 464 (62 SE2d 209). Unless there is “fault” chargeable to the employee, there can be no disqualification from benefits. Smith v. Caldwell, 142 Ga. App. 130, 131 (3) (235 SE2d 547); Colbert v. Caldwell, 144 Ga. App. 220 (240…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Dalton Brick & Tile Co. v. HuietCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Millen v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.