Legal Opinion
Chandler v. James
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 2011No. Civil Action 06-664PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the United States, the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”), the Court Services and Offender Agency (“CSOSA”), Charles James, and Linwood A. Williams (together, “the federal defendants”) to dismiss the plaintiffs claims against them or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Also pending are a total of seventeen motions filed by the plaintiff, consisting of ten motions to amend or supplement the complaint; a motion “to produce evidence” that is, in effect, another motion to amend the complaint; two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Chandler v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Wills v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.