Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. United States Cordage Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided March 16, 1895No. 512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was a suit in equity by Michael Donnelly against the United States Cordage Company for infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

COLT, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill in equity brought for the infringement of a patent by a citizen of Massachusetts against the defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey, but having a usual place of business in Boston, in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The case was heard upon demurrer to the bill for want of jurisdiction.

The question in issue arises under section 1 of the act of March 3, 1887 (24 Stat. c. 373), as corrected by the act of August 13, 1888 (25 Stat. c. 866; 1 Supp. Rev. St. 611), the material parts of which are as follows:

“The circuit courts of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bowers v. Atlantic, G. & P. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  3. Gorham Manuf'g Co. v. WatsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1896
  4. National Button Works v. WadeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  5. Thoma v. PerriDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API