Legal Opinion

Neet v. Holmes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1944No. L. A. 18495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

25 Cal.2d 447 (1944)

THOMAS PORTER NEET et al., Appellants,

v.

KENNETH A. HOLMES et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 18495.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 23, 1944.

Wm. Ellis Lady, W. I. Gilbert, Jr., Finlayson, Bennett & Morrow and Frank G. Finlayson for Appellants.

Ralph D. Brown, Joseph Doyle, Geo. I. Devor and Geo. L. Reimbold for Respondents.

SHENK, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining demurrers to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. The action is to rescind a mining lease and to establish a constructive trust of mining…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DM Residential Fund II, LLC v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API